Your exploration of consciousness theories, particularly Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection (TNGS), underscores the importance of tangible outcomes in evaluating these frameworks. Indeed, Edelman's work, particularly exemplified by the Darwin series of automata, offers compelling insights into the emergence of consciousness. However, it's valuable to consider alternative perspectives, such as those put forth by Donald Hoffman, another esteemed UC Irvine professor. Hoffman's Interface Theory of Perception challenges traditional notions of reality and consciousness, suggesting that our perceptions are more akin to a user interface rather than a direct reflection of reality. Integrating ideas from both Edelman's TNGS and Hoffman's Interface Theory could enrich our understanding of consciousness and its potential replication in machines. While TNGS provides a robust biological framework, Hoffman's theory offers a provocative perspective on the nature of perception, reminding us to approach the study of consciousness with openness to diverse viewpoints. As you advocate for the dissemination of TNGS, incorporating insights from various scholars, including Hoffman, could further deepen public discourse on this intriguing subject.